I haven't danced spontaneously in ages. But today, standing in Carrie's little NY apartment, with Bryan's 'Get Frisky' mix playing I felt compelled to bop around a bit like the big dork that I am. I think this is a good sign. I still feel pretty far from 'normal' (whatever the hell that means) but I think I might go so far as to classify how I'm feeling today as 'better.' And these days, I'll take what I can get.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
About Me
- Name: Megan
- Location: southeast, United States
I never know what to put in these little boxes. If you read my blog, shouldn't you already know about me?
daily stalking
Kate
Sid
A
Reen
Sara
Steve
Mark
Bryan
Amelia
Duncan and Kris
The Canadians
I Blame the Patriarchy
Book Goodness
A White Bear
Dionysum
cylindricine
Moms I one day hope to be like
Geeky Goodness
Scientific Activist
Good Math, Bad Math
Previous Posts
- I realized that after the last few posts if I pull...
- Note to self - when having days like today, do not...
- Day 3has not been good. Woke up a little before n...
- The Second WindSwinging back by my apartment to pi...
- Day 1So I decided to start taking Lexapro yesterda...
- SCOTUSAccording to archived documents of Roberts's...
- AbortionAmelia confirms my (personally, somewhat s...
- Gah! I just got a postcard from Jess from Egypt! ...
- Oh! And because I really am this dorky, I used th...
- Ech. Went for a run this morning, then loaded hea...
2 Comments:
A pre-emptive "forgive me" is in order, so here it is. That being said: say you have 3 variables (a,b,c), each with N observations. But you have M trials for each set of variables(M trials of N observations for a, same for b, same for c). What's the best way to figure out the correlations (i.e. obtain some sort of correlation coefficient) between a&b and a&c, other than averaging each of the variables across trials?
Thank you!
-Ahalya
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Post a Comment
<< Home